|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our Accounting Firm
Los Angeles CPAs: Richards, Greenberg & Co.
Last Updated: Local communities for which we provide CPA, accounting, tax preparation and business consulting services:
|
TAX HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2003In mid-year, I sent all of my clients and friends a Special Bulletin outlining the Jobs and Growth Tax Act of 2003. If you’d like another copy, please contact me. In this bulletin I will only highlight certain provisions of the Act, outline several tax planning pointers. As far as complexity and volume of material, just consider this . . .
Individual TaxesIndividual and corporate rates are pretty much the same.
10% tax bracket expanded to $7,000 (single), and $14,000 (married), adjusted for inflation in 2004. (Reverting in 2005 to 2007 to $6,000 (single) and $12,000 (married). Planning pointer: Here is an opportunity for parents to shift income to their age 14 and older children to take advantage of this bracket. Dividend income now taxed at 5% and 15% rates. Taxpayers in the 15% and 10% regular tax brackets are taxed at 5% for dividends. Taxpayers in regular tax brackets over 15%, will have dividends taxes at a 15% rate. Pointer: If you do not hold a share of stock for more than 60 days during the 120-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date, dividends received on the stock are not eligible for the reduced rates. Note: California provides no special tax treatment for dividends, which are taxed as the taxpayer’s regular rate. Social Security benefit calculator at www.ssa.gov/retire offers three increasingly detailed levels of benefit estimates for your retirement benefits. You can 1) calculate your retirement benefits using different retirement scenarios, b) find out how certain types of earnings and pensions can affect your retirement benefits, c) see if your spouse and children will be eligible for Social Security benefits on your records, and more. Alternative Minimum Tax (or is it the Mandatory Minimum Tax?) This is no joke! According to a Congressional Research Service (CRS) report, “The Alternative Minimum Tax for Individuals”, the number of taxpayers subject to the AMT will increase from approximately 1.8 million in 2001 to over 35 million (33 percent of all taxpayers) by 2010, if no tax legislative changes are made. It is estimated that repealing the individual AMT would cost from $640 to $840 billion over the 2003-2012 period. So, let’s figure that AMT is here to stay. Three items presently account for 90% of the dollar value of AMT additions to regular tax.. The top six preferences are: 1) State and local tax deductions, 2) Personal exemptions, 3) Miscellaneous deductions above the 2% floor, 4) Net operating losses, 5) Incentive stock options, and 6) Passive items
Some AMT Planning Pointers:
(You should seek a professional to assist you with these calculations) ): 1) See
if spreading the preference items between two years reduces or increases the AMT
tax rate, 2) Prepay state income and property taxes cautiously.
The deduction may be wasted in an AMT year. 3) Interest paid on home equity
borrowing for ‘other’ than home improvements is not deductible for AMT, 4) If an
employer will reimburse business expenses, the employee avoids AMT on this
preference.
There are more.
Child tax credit refund of $1,000 was
mailed to taxpayers during July and August based on information on your 2002
return filed in 2003. If you were
not eligible for the advance payment you may still qualify for the increased
child tax credit of up to $1,000 when you file your 2003 tax return.
Please let your tax
preparer know the amount of this credit you received in 2003. Self-employed health insurance, which is an above-the-line deduction, increases to 100% in 2003. Planning pointer: Medicare premiums and long-term care insurance premiums are considered health insurance for this purpose. Long-term care insurance. Some pointers for choosing a long-term care policy are: 1. Determine resources. If you qualify for Medicaid, you don’t have enough money for premiums. 2. Purchase at the appropriate age to save on premiums. 3. Don’t forget inflation protection. 4. Buy a tax qualified plan. Nearly 90% of plans sold are tax qualified. Section 529 educational plans. This is a tax-free method to pay for qualified higher education expenses. See www.savingforcollege.com for general information and comparative analysis of the various state plans. See www.scholarshare.com for information for the California ScholarShare plan. Pros and cons of Section 529 at a glance.
Gift tax. The 2003 annual exclusion remains at $11,000. IRA provisions. An individual can make a contribution to a Traditional or Roth IRA up to the lesser of $3,000 or the individual’s compensation if neither the individual nor the individual’s spouse is an active participant in an employer-sponsored retirement plan. Individual not active participant, but spouse is. The IRA deduction is phased out for taxpayers with AGI between $150,000 and $160,000.
Annual IRA contribution limits are increased as follows:
Additional catch-up IRA contributions are permitted for those 50 and over, in the following amounts:
Sale of stock by nonresidents – tax planning pointer: An individual who owns all or a majority of the stock in a corporation, should consider moving out of California prior to selling the stock in anticipation of retirement. The sale of stock is considered intangible property and is sourced to the taxpayer’s state of residence. The move to the nontax state should take place before even beginning the process of looking for a buyer. This plan does not apply to the sale of a California corporation’s assets, for which gain on sale will be sourced to California.
Business Taxes The 2003 law provides some needed tax relief to businesses by increasing the additional first year depreciation percentage, adding to the first year luxury auto write off, and quadrupling the section 179 expensing amount. Bonus depreciation.
You can
elect to use the 30% or the 50% bonus, or neither, on a property-by-property
basis.
Increased section 179 expensing – This section allows a taxpayer to deduct
a portion of the cost of certain business property instead of depreciating it.
The Act increases the amount that can be deducted from $25,000 to $100,000,
increases the level of expenses above which the deduction is further limited
from $200,000 to $400,000, and permits revocation of the election to expense
without IRS consent. These new rules are in effect for 2003 through 2005. Auto expense There are severe depreciation limitations for passenger automobiles. For purposes of the depreciation caps, a passenger automobile includes any four-wheeled vehicle manufactured primarily for us on public streets, roads, and highways, that has an unloaded gross vehicle weight (i.e. curb weight fully equipped for service but without passengers or cargo) of 6,000 pounds or less. A truck or van (including a sport utility vehicle or minivan) is treated as a passenger automobile if it has a gross vehicle weight (i.e. maximum total weight of a loaded vehicle as specified by the manufacturer) of 6,000 pounds or less. Consequently, some large SUVs are not subject to the depreciation caps. The following 2003 SUVs have approximate gross vehicle weights (GVW) exceeding 6,000 pounds, allowing the Section 179 expensing rules on the first $100,000 and depreciation, including the 30%/50% additional first year depreciation, of the balance, if any, over 5 years: AM General Hummer · BMW X5 · Cadillac Escalade · Chevy Suburban, Tahoe, Trail Blazer · Dodge Durango · Ford Excursion, Expedition · GMC Envoy, Yukon, Yukon Denali · Land Rover Discovery ¨ Lexus LX 470 · Lincoln Navigator, Aviator · Mercedes M Class SUV · Mitsubishi Montero · Porsche Cayenne · Toyota Land Cruiser, Sequoia SUV · VW Touareg Be sure to check the specific vehicle for its GVW before buying it. The GVW is listed on a metal place on the inside of the driver’s door. GVW can be found for other models at www.intellichoice.com.
Investment
Reduction in capital gains rate (for both regular and AMT tax) – The 20% maximum rate on net capital gains is reduced to 15% for individuals, estates, and trusts for capital assets sold or exchanged (and to installment payments received) on or after May 6, 2003 and continuing through 2008. For taxpayers in the 15% and 10% regular tax brackets, the 10% capital gains rate is reduced to 5% starting May 6, 2003 and is reduced to zero for 2008 only. The capital gains rates return to 2002 levels in 2009.
Note:
The maximum capital gain rates do not apply if they are higher than the
taxpayer’s regular tax rate. There
is no change to the rates on short-term capital gains, which continue to be
taxed at ordinary income rates. I am available to discuss any of these matters with you. Your resource for all of your tax, financial, and business planning matters,
To ensure compliance with revised Treasury Regulations under Circular 230, this is to advise you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code that may be asserted against the taxpayer, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements under federal law. SPECIAL BULLETIN - JULY 2003 July, 2003 Before delving into provisions that will reduce your tax bill, I’d like to give you my viewpoint on the ‘big picture’. In June 2001, President Bush signed into law the Tax Act of 2001. The law provided for $1.3 trillion of tax relief over the next 10 years, with all provisions expiring after December 31, 2010. Under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, Congress adopted procedures to attempt to control its own spending. In 1990, the Budget Act incorporated the Byrd rule, which meant that any provision that would increase the deficit for a fiscal year beyond those covered by the measure is subject to that procedure. In simple English, under the Byrd rule, unless Congress takes affirmative action, the provisions of the Tax Act of 2001 will ‘sunset’ (terminate) after December 31, 2010. As I understand it, if there are no surpluses as projected by the year 2011, the Act will sunset. If there are surpluses as projected, then sunset is repealed and the Act continues on. Unless of course, events in 2010 dictate that Congress take new action. The 2001 Act was tail-end loaded: Tax reductions of $475 billion took effect in the first 5 years, and $875 billion in the last 5 years. The 2003 Tax Act merely accelerates, temporarily, a number of individual tax reductions that were enacted in 2001 with delayed effective dates. The Richards explanation . . . The U.S. economy has been stalled for too long and too many people are out of work. Fund raising for the 2004 Presidential elections has begun. The election is 1-1/4 years away. It takes time to turn the economy around. The confluence of these situations made it prudent for the President to take action. The acceleration of some of the provision of the 2001 Act make good sense, and will put money into the hands of the public. Whether or not the 2003 Act will heat up the economy, remains to be seen. Alan Greenspan has lowered interest rates to a 45-year low and that hasn’t helped. I personally believe that the old tricks won’t work because we are now, for the first time ever, in a true global economy. There will be a learning curve before our economists can figure out the ‘new world economic order’. what should you do about the tax act? Changes in the relative tax rates on ordinary income, dividends, and capital gains mean possible reconsideration of savings and investment decisions. The potential that most of the changes will eventually be extended, and the temporary nature of the lower rates on capital gains and dividends makes long-term planning difficult. Two good solutions for making sense of the 2003 Tax Act are: continue to make your business and investment decisions based on sound, basic economic considerations rather than be tax driven, and; seek advise from your tax-planning professional. My very best wishes for the summer. Your resource for all of your tax, financial, and business planning matters,
To ensure compliance with revised Treasury Regulations under Circular 230, this is to advise you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code that may be asserted against the taxpayer, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements under federal law. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2003 TAX ACT In attempting to provide an overview of provisions, not all the details are included. Therefore, do not attempt to make tax judgments from this material. If you believe a provision applies to your situation and would like to know how your personal situation is impacted, you should contact your tax-planning advisor. Effective for 2003 and 2004
Effective for 2003 to 2008
Business Provisions
The Economy (and what it means to us) (or – a case for strategic planning and business management)
Sale of Life Insurance Policies
NEWS ARCHIVES:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To ensure compliance with revised Treasury Regulations under Circular 230, this is to advise you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code that may be asserted against the taxpayer, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements under federal law. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||